Yesterday a federal appeals court ruled
that retroactive application of Michigan's Sex Offender Registration
Act (SORA) violates the Constitution's ban on ex post facto laws. In
doing so, it offered a scathing assessment of such laws that suggests
they make little sense even when they're constitutional.
Article here. (via reason.com 's Hit and Run blog)
Responding to a challenge brought by five men and one woman who
committed sex offenses before Michigan's legislature expanded SORA's
requirements, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit concludes
that the added provisions, although framed as civil regulations, are
mainly punitive in their effects.
Showing posts with label SOR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOR. Show all posts
Friday, August 26, 2016
Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Michigan law maker proposes new Sex Offender Registry changes after 1,000 ft radius declared unconstitutional
Portions of the Sex Offender Registry (SOR) law were declared unconstitutional earlier this year. That's because the requirement that people on the SOR were supposed to stay at least 1,000 feet from a school at all times.
Article here.
But never fear, Michigan law makers are ready to amend the 1994 legislation - yet again- to re-include the 1,000 ft requirement, and in such a way that the law would not be considered over-broad.
More details to follow. . . .
Article here.
But never fear, Michigan law makers are ready to amend the 1994 legislation - yet again- to re-include the 1,000 ft requirement, and in such a way that the law would not be considered over-broad.
More details to follow. . . .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)