Some legal "technology" that should be obsolete

Still clinging to "technology" like fax machines, and copiers? The lawyerist argues that you should let it go.

Article here.

On a personal note, I know of many typewriters being used by attorneys. And I am often asked - by courts, clients, and opposing counsel - if I have a fax (which I don't). 

Two screens are not better than one (Or how using two screens can lower your productivity).

For years, techies have argued that getting an extra monitor or two for your desktop computer is an especially effective way to increase personal productivity. The logic seemed airtight: Two (or more) computer monitors means more room on your virtual desktop, which means more room to do your work. And more room to work would seem to mean faster work.

 ... But what if we’ve all been duped? What if more monitors and bigger monitors actually detract from, rather than improve, how you work?

From taxprof blog, article here. 

Does your law practice need updating? Technology concerns?

Do you have a tendency to be slow to change your ways? Have you resisted changing due to technological issues? It's not just a quaint thing, for lawyers to resist change & act in Luddite-like ways: instead, it's possible that a lawyer who fails to change due to technology could be facing ethical violations.

Article here.