Showing posts with label big law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label big law. Show all posts
Saturday, October 12, 2013
Reasons to leave Big Law, or to never go there in the first place
Thinking you have to work a job in Big Law to pay off your student loan debt? Or just wanting to get there because it's a good end goal? Read this list and think again.
I think #3 is my top on the list.
Thursday, October 10, 2013
Are lawyers happy in their work?
My new library book: The Happy Lawyer.
This was published in 2010, and its goal is to examine what makes lawyers happy. It's a good read so far, but I've only gotten to comparison of studies asking lawyers (in various ways) whether they are happy being lawyers.
Here's a link to read reviews or buy it on Amazon.
This was published in 2010, and its goal is to examine what makes lawyers happy. It's a good read so far, but I've only gotten to comparison of studies asking lawyers (in various ways) whether they are happy being lawyers.
Here's a link to read reviews or buy it on Amazon.
Monday, October 7, 2013
Is there an apocalypse now?
Does the legal profession face an apocalypse, or is this all the same old problem? Many have expressed this opinion since 2008, citing as evidence that big law firms are making drastic cuts, law schools are facing declining enrollment, and state bar associations are making their exams harder to pass.
Not so! According to Russell Pearce, in an essay he's published showing the five areas of crisis, and how it's actually history repeating itself.
Read the full article here:Nothing New Under the Sun
From the abstract:
Drawing upon Julius Henry Cohen’s classic 1916 work, 'The Law: Business or Profession?', this Essay explains that the challenges facing the legal profession today are not new and that in current debates lawyers, judges, and law professors too often rely on inaccurate assumptions regarding the history of the legal profession. In particular, this Essay identifies five crises facing the legal profession today that parallel challenges at the turn of the Twentieth Century: (1) determining whether law is a business or a profession; (2) debating whether lawyers have responsibility for civic and business leadership; (3) considering whether lawyers should have control of the market for legal services; (4) promoting reform of legal education; and (5) managing increased diversity. The Essay argues that placing these crises in historical context reveals that the legal profession’s responses to these dilemmas have varied over time, suggests that today’s status quo is neither traditional nor inevitable, and seeks to create space for rethinking assumptions that underpin our current debates.
Not so! According to Russell Pearce, in an essay he's published showing the five areas of crisis, and how it's actually history repeating itself.
Read the full article here:Nothing New Under the Sun
From the abstract:
Drawing upon Julius Henry Cohen’s classic 1916 work, 'The Law: Business or Profession?', this Essay explains that the challenges facing the legal profession today are not new and that in current debates lawyers, judges, and law professors too often rely on inaccurate assumptions regarding the history of the legal profession. In particular, this Essay identifies five crises facing the legal profession today that parallel challenges at the turn of the Twentieth Century: (1) determining whether law is a business or a profession; (2) debating whether lawyers have responsibility for civic and business leadership; (3) considering whether lawyers should have control of the market for legal services; (4) promoting reform of legal education; and (5) managing increased diversity. The Essay argues that placing these crises in historical context reveals that the legal profession’s responses to these dilemmas have varied over time, suggests that today’s status quo is neither traditional nor inevitable, and seeks to create space for rethinking assumptions that underpin our current debates.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

