Yesterday a federal appeals court ruled
that retroactive application of Michigan's Sex Offender Registration
Act (SORA) violates the Constitution's ban on ex post facto laws. In
doing so, it offered a scathing assessment of such laws that suggests
they make little sense even when they're constitutional.
Article here. (via reason.com 's Hit and Run blog)
Responding to a challenge brought by five men and one woman who
committed sex offenses before Michigan's legislature expanded SORA's
requirements, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit concludes
that the added provisions, although framed as civil regulations, are
mainly punitive in their effects.